logo
 

crisis

leaflets

fundraise

Conference Centre



Master Card
Secure online credit card payments powered by:

Netcash

Harsh sentence for mentally ill man

Randburg magistrate, Hambokazi Thwele, has been criticised for sentencing Itumeleng Manda (38) to an effective three months for assault, despite evidence that he was suffering from a mental disability.

According to Sections 78 and 79 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Manda should have been referred for mental observation.

It would have been better for the magistrate to err on the side of caution,’ said Criminal law expert Advocate Nduduzo Jiyane. “The man should have been sent to a district surgeon or a mental health specialist for observation and a proper assessment.

Jiyane said that it was also not appropriate for Manda to be allowed to represent himself if he appeared not to be in a good state of mind.

Mental health expert Bharti Patel from the South African Federation for Mental Health also believes the court did not do enough to afford Manda his full rights as contained in both the country’s Constitution and the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities.

Institutions such as courts are obliged to take appropriate measures to provide persons with disabilities with the support they might require in exercising their legal capacity, she said.

[ Posted 28 June 2012 ]

HTML Comment Box is loading comments...


Back to news

Thoughts Newsletter

Read our newsletter online
or download printable pdf



Donate


Get email updates







Vertical Response





Email Marketing by VerticalResponse

 

 

spacer
 
 
 


Website designed and maintained by

DMI

CONTACT US | SITE MAP | TERMS & CONDITIONS